Greek Theater

Griffith Merry-Go-Round

L.A. Equestrian Center

L.A. Zoo

Pony Rides

Travel Town
Griffith Home
FEEDBACK FORM - Griffith Park Master Plan DRAFT (March 2005)
 
The Draft Master Plan Text and Maps can be found at: http://www.laparks.org/dos/parks/griffithPK/masterplan2005/masterplan2005.htm
   
 
Notify Me About
All Griffith Park Issues Master Plan
Both Griffith Park & Master Plan Issues
Name
Street/Apt
City
Zip Code
E-mail
Preferred Contact
  Please feel free to answer questions or submit comments in all or any of the sections below. You can turn in multiple forms as you continue to study the Draft plan.
   
GENERAL IMPRESSIONS
   
  1. Overall organization of draft plan made sense.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  2. Draft plan is readable and understandable.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  3. Headings and sections in each chapter flowed and made sense.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  4. Appearance is attractive and appropriate.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  5. Strongest Chapter 1-9 was:
   
  6. Weakest Chapter 1-9 was:
   
  7. Griffith Park should have its own Superintendent.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  8. Comments:
 
   
VISION
   
  1. The Vision accurately describes Griffith Park as I would like it to be in 25 years.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  2. The Objectives support the Vision.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  3. Which, if any, Objective did not seem to support the Vision?
 
  4. Was an appropriate Objective missing?
 
  5. Comments:
 
   
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
   
  1. Sufficiently covers native landscapes and habitat.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  2. Needs stronger protections for environment, such as no-access zones.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  3. Park Ecologist is needed.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  4. Trail use and preservation plan is good.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  5. Comments:
 
   
MOBILITY
   
  1. Aerial trams should be considered as a possibility.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  2. Traffic calming plans will be good for the Park.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  3. Parking structures are good ways to consolidate many existing surface parking lots.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  4. Off-site parking will be an important solution to park crowding.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  5. Comments:
 
   
BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN GUIDELINES
   
  1. Liked the 7 geographic area names used to describe physical relocations in the Park.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  2. Liked the 4 design zone names used to establish design themes for areas in the Park.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  3. Too many relocations and consolidations of existing facilities.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  4. Prohibition is clear against constructing more facilities outside the limits of the current developed footprint.
  1 - Disagree   2 - Neutral   3- Agree
  5. Comments:
 
 
Enter the code shown below
SECURITY CODE